The age-old debate people have discussed at least once is, does experience beat qualification? My previous stance was that experience always beats theory as learning in action is one of the best ways to gain experience. However, this is a flawed view when not considering numerous factors since every skill requires some sort of theory for adequate insight.
Practical and theoretical knowledge is necessary for development. The biggest issue is the desire to do one or the other. Putting off either one will only result in a delay as you will inevitably have to start doing both. I understand the expenditure of effort is larger than focusing on one, but you can only get so far by reading or performing. The content today will not cover work-related debates instead it will be a general outline of the benefits of performing practical and theory simultaneously.
Theory enables a greater understanding; you’re cutting yourself short by only focusing on the practical. Yes, you can still learn a huge amount through hands-on experience however you’re leaving a lot on the table. There is a reason why University is sought after, the knowledge acquired sets us up for practical learning after completion of the degree. Although, there is a lack practical knowledge, understanding of the field is better than those who are theory-less. Techniques, methods, and research do not have to be attained through a means of formal education, you can most definitely learn through books or short courses. The issue is that those who have extensive experience are not interested in the theory aspect which, in my opinion, prevents progression.
Difference between practical and theoretical knowledge
Practical knowledge is learning in the form of performing, putting yourself in the situation, making mistakes, and developing as you go. Theoretical knowledge is knowing the requirements to execute the skill or task.
Is theoretical knowledge necessary?
I’ve had a hand full of jobs in the past 8 years and every manager I worked under, didn’t have a formal education relating to their chosen position. Their knowledge was acquired through practical work obtaining the necessary skills required in order to be successful in the role. This is not to say theoretical practice does not have its place. All of my managers could have attended courses and training to further develop their expertise. They were just not interested in learning outside of work, which is understandable. Spending more time for your work outside of working hours isn’t favourable by many. Some are happy with their existing knowledge and do not feel the need to improve as they’re content with their rate of growth through practical learning.
Knowledge can be accelerated when both theory and practice are implemented and used in accordance with one another. Every endeavour is unique, some may require more practical understanding than theory and vice versa. This doesn’t mean our efforts shouldn’t be dedicated to one method as progress may be hindered due to lazy beliefs. Valuing both approaches to learning is a systematic way to ensure full comprehension. Having said that, I can understand that not everyone wishes to learn at a faster rate, perhaps they’re content with their current growth of progression. Those before us have tested, tried, and failed at almost everything in life. We would be fools not to pay attention and learn from our predecessors.